{"type":"thread.started","thread_id":"019b693a-7253-76f3-9513-0d504995011e"} {"type":"turn.started"} {"type":"item.started","item":{"id":"item_0","type":"command_execution","command":"/bin/zsh -lc 'cd /Users/banteg/dev/banteg/agents/takopi && ls'","aggregated_output":"","exit_code":null,"status":"in_progress"}} {"type":"item.completed","item":{"id":"item_0","type":"command_execution","command":"/bin/zsh -lc 'cd /Users/banteg/dev/banteg/agents/takopi && ls'","aggregated_output":"__pycache__\t\t\treadme.md\r\nbridge.zip\t\t\tsrc\r\ncodex.jsonl\t\t\ttests\r\ncodex_exec_explore_bridge.jsonl\tuv.lock\r\nexec_bridge.log\t\t\twork.md\r\npyproject.toml\r\n","exit_code":0,"status":"completed"}} {"type":"item.started","item":{"id":"item_1","type":"command_execution","command":"/bin/zsh -lc 'cd /Users/banteg/dev/banteg/agents/takopi && find .. -maxdepth 2 -name AGENTS.md -print'","aggregated_output":"","exit_code":null,"status":"in_progress"}} {"type":"item.completed","item":{"id":"item_1","type":"command_execution","command":"/bin/zsh -lc 'cd /Users/banteg/dev/banteg/agents/takopi && find .. -maxdepth 2 -name AGENTS.md -print'","aggregated_output":"../.codex/AGENTS.md\r\n","exit_code":0,"status":"completed"}} {"type":"item.started","item":{"id":"item_2","type":"command_execution","command":"/bin/zsh -lc 'cd /Users/banteg/dev/banteg/agents/takopi && rg -n \"telegram|bridge|bot|webhook|polling|openai|codex\" -S . || true'","aggregated_output":"","exit_code":null,"status":"in_progress"}} {"type":"item.completed","item":{"id":"item_2","type":"command_execution","command":"/bin/zsh -lc 'cd /Users/banteg/dev/banteg/agents/takopi && rg -n \"telegram|bridge|bot|webhook|polling|openai|codex\" -S . || true'","aggregated_output":"Total output lines: 376\n\n./src/takopi/telegram_client.py\r\n11:class TelegramClient:\r\n13: Minimal Telegram Bot API client.\r\n18: raise ValueError(\"Telegram token is empty\")\r\n19: self._base = f\"https://api.telegram.org/bot{token}\"\r\n31: raise RuntimeError(f\"Telegram API error: {payload}\")\r\n34: logger.error(\"Telegram network error: %s\", e)\r\n\r\n./src/takopi/__init__.py\r\n1:\"\"\"Telegram Codex bridge package.\"\"\"\r\n\r\n./codex.jsonl\r\n3:{\"type\":\"item.started\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_0\",\"type\":\"command_execution\",\"command\":\"/bin/zsh -lc 'cd /Users/banteg/dev/banteg/agents/takopi && ls'\",\"aggregated_output\":\"\",\"exit_code\":null,\"status\":\"in_progress\"}}\r\n4:{\"type\":\"item.completed\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_0\",\"type\":\"command_execution\",\"command\":\"/bin/zsh -lc 'cd /Users/banteg/dev/banteg/agents/takopi && ls'\",\"aggregated_output\":\"__pycache__\\t\\t\\treadme.md\\r\\nbridge.zip\\t\\t\\tsrc\\r\\ncodex.jsonl\\t\\t\\ttests\\r\\ncodex_exec_explore_bridge.jsonl\\tuv.lock\\r\\nexec_bridge.log\\t\\t\\twork.md\\r\\npyproject.toml\\r\\n\",\"exit_code\":0,\"status\":\"completed\"}}\r\n5:{\"type\":\"item.started\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_1\",\"type\":\"command_execution\",\"command\":\"/bin/zsh -lc 'cd /Users/banteg/dev/banteg/agents/takopi && find .. -maxdepth 2 -name AGENTS.md -print'\",\"aggregated_output\":\"\",\"exit_code\":null,\"status\":\"in_progress\"}}\r\n6:{\"type\":\"item.completed\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_1\",\"type\":\"command_execution\",\"command\":\"/bin/zsh -lc 'cd /Users/banteg/dev/banteg/agents/takopi && find .. -maxdepth 2 -name AGENTS.md -print'\",\"aggregated_output\":\"../.codex/AGENTS.md\\r\\n\",\"exit_code\":0,\"status\":\"completed\"}}\r\n7:{\"type\":\"item.started\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_2\",\"type\":\"command_execution\",\"command\":\"/bin/zsh -lc 'cd /Users/banteg/dev/banteg/agents/takopi && rg -n \\\"telegram|bridge|bot|webhook|polling|openai|codex\\\" -S . || true'\",\"aggregated_output\":\"\",\"exit_code\":null,\"status\":\"in_progress\"}}\r\n\r\n./work.md\r\n5:1. **Switch to `asyncio`**: The current code heavily uses `threading`, `ThreadPoolExecutor`, and `subprocess.Popen` with blocking I/O. This is the primary source of complexity (locks, daemon threads, joining). A Telegram bot + Subprocess manager is a textbook use case for `asyncio`.\r\n10:### 1. `src/takopi/telegram_client.py`\r\n20:class TelegramClient:\r\n22: self._base = f\"https://api.telegram.org/bot{token}\"\r\n34: raise RuntimeError(f\"Telegram API Error: {data}\")\r\n37: logger.error(f\"Telegram Network Error: {e}\")\r\n57:### 2. `src/takopi/rendering.py`\r\n59:**Change:** Remove `sulguk`. Telegram accepts a subset of HTML. We can use `markdown-it-py` to generate HTML and let Telegram parse it. This removes the manual entity construction logic.\r\n64:# Telegram only supports specific tags. \r\n70: Renders Markdown to Telegram-supported HTML.\r\n73: but MarkdownIt default output is generally safe for this bridge.\r\n76: # MarkdownIt wraps everything in
, Telegram doesn't like nested block tags sometimes,\r\n78: # A simple improvement for Telegram: replace
with nothing and use
\r\n83:### 3. `src/takopi/exec_bridge.py`\r\n101:from .config import load_telegram_config\r\n102:from .constants import TELEGRAM_HARD_LIMIT\r\n105:from .telegram_client import TelegramClient\r\n107:logger = logging.getLogger(\"exec_bridge\")\r\n111:TELEGRAM_TEXT_LIMIT = 4000 # Leave buffer for HTML tags\r\n126: if len(text) <= TELEGRAM_TEXT_LIMIT:\r\n128: return text[:TELEGRAM_TEXT_LIMIT - 100] + \"\\n...(truncated)\"\r\n132:class AsyncCodexRunner:\r\n198: raise RuntimeError(f\"Codex failed (rc={rc}): {stderr_data.decode()[-200:]}\")\r\n201: raise RuntimeError(\"No session_id captured from codex stream.\")\r\n208: bot: TelegramClient, \r\n212: runner: AsyncCodexRunner,\r\n224: sent_msg = await bot.send_message(\r\n245: await bot.edit_message_text(\r\n271: await bot.send_message(chat_id=chat_id, text=final_html, parse_mode=\"HTML\")\r\n272: await bot.delete_message(chat_id=chat_id, message_id=progress_msg_id)\r\n275: await bot.edit_message_text(chat_id=chat_id, message_id=progress_msg_id, text=final_html, parse_mode=\"HTML\")\r\n279: await bot.edit_message_text(chat_id=chat_id, message_id=progress_msg_id, text=err_text, parse_mode=\"HTML\")\r\n283:async def bridge_loop(config: dict, cli_args: dict):\r\n284: token = config[\"bot_token\"]\r\n285: bot = TelegramClient(token)\r\n288: codex_cmd = config.get(\"codex_cmd\", \"codex\")\r\n289: workspace = cli_args.get(\"workdir\") or config.get(\"codex_workspace\")\r\n290: extra_args = shlex.split(str(config.get(\"codex_exec_args\", \"\")))\r\n294: runner = AsyncCodexRunner(codex_cmd, extra_args, workspace)\r\n297: logger.info(\"Bridge started (Async).\")\r\n303: updates = await bot.get_updates(offset=offset, timeout=20, allowed_updates=[\"message\"])\r\n311: bot, \r\n324: await bot.close()\r\n330: log_file: str = \"exec_bridge.log\",\r\n335: config = load_telegram_config()\r\n346: asyncio.run(bridge_loop(config, args))\r\n\r\n./src/takopi/rendering.py\r\n18: # FIX: Telegram requires MessageEntity.language (if present) to be a String.\r\n\r\n./src/takopi/config.py\r\n4:from .constants import TELEGRAM_CONFIG_PATH\r\n7:def load_telegram_config(path=None):\r\n8: cfg_path = Path(path) if path else TELEGRAM_CONFIG_PATH\r\n\r\n./exec_bridge.log\r\n1:2025-12-29 11:32:12,510 [debug] file logger initialized path='exec_bridge.log'\r\n4:2025-12-29 11:32:30,656 [codex] start run session_id=None workspace=None\r\n5:2025-12-29 11:32:30,670 [codex] spawn pid=38871 args=['/opt/homebrew/bin/codex', 'exec', '--json', '-c', 'notify=[]', '-']\r\n6:2025-12-29 11:32:30,852 [codex] thread started\r\n7:2025-12-29 11:32:30,852 [codex] turn started\r\n8:2025-12-29 11:32:38,967 [codex] [0] **Assessing user request**\r\n10:I need to address the user's request about not needing the \"progress silent option.\" First, I'll check the repo takopi to find where this might be used. It looks like I should remove this option from the CLI or code that references progress. I'll also make sure to follow the AGENTS instructions, especially for git and Python commands, using conventional commits style and preferring uv for testing. I need to look more into the repository structure.\r\n11:2025-12-29 11:32:39,230 [codex] [1] ▸ running: `/bin/zsh -lc ls`\r\n12:2025-12-29 11:32:39,331 [codex] [1] ✓ ran: `/bin/zsh -lc ls` (exit 0)\r\n13:2025-12-29 11:32:44,335 [codex] [2] **Searching Python project options**\r\n16:2025-12-29 11:32:44,566 [codex] [3] ▸ running: `/bin/zsh -lc 'rg -n…`\r\n17:2025-12-29 11:32:44,696 [codex] [3] ✓ ran: `/bin/zsh -lc 'rg -n…` (exit 0)\r\n18:2025-12-29 11:32:51,849 [codex] [4] I'm looking at the progress_silent option in exec_bridge.py and its documentation. It seems I need to remove it, so my next step is to open the relevant file and check the lines surrounding where this option is defined. I might use sed to view specific lines or nl for numbering the lines. Definitely, I'll start inspecting exec_bridge.py around the definition of that option to assess what to remove.\r\n19:2025-12-29 11:32:52,193 [codex] [5] ▸ running: `/bin/zsh -lc \"sed -n '520,660p'…`\r\n20:2025-12-29 11:32:52,314 [codex] [5] ✓ ran: `/bin/zsh -lc \"sed -n '520,660p'…` (exit 0)\r\n21:2025-12-29 11:32:55,967 [codex][stderr] 2025-12-29T07:32:55.966504Z ERROR codex_core::codex: failed to send tool call event: sending into a closed channel\r\n22:2025-12-29 11:48:21,020 [debug] file logger initialized path='exec_bridge.log'\r\n25:2025-12-29 11:48:29,010 [codex] start run session_id=None workspace=None\r\n26:2025-12-29 11:48:29,027 [codex] spawn pid=51835 args=['/opt/homebrew/bin/codex', 'exec', '--json', '-c', 'notify=[]', '-']\r\n27:2025-12-29 11:48:32,221 [codex] thread started\r\n28:2025-12-29 11:48:32,222 [codex] turn started\r\n29:2025-12-29 11:48:42,625 [codex] [0] **Modifying code for notification fix**\r\n32:2025-12-29 11:48:42,627 [codex] [1] **Assessing the use of planning**\r\n35:2025-12-29 11:48:42,947 [codex] [2] ▸ running: `/bin/zsh -lc 'cd…`\r\n36:2025-12-29 11:48:43,037 [codex] [2] ✓ ran: `/bin/zsh -lc 'cd…` (exit 0)\r\n37:2025-12-29 11:48:46,641 [codex] [3] ▸ running: `/bin/zsh -lc \"cd…`\r\n38:2025-12-29 11:48:46,762 [codex] [3] ✓ ran: `/bin/zsh -lc \"cd…` (exit 0)\r\n39:2025-12-29 11:48:50,023 [codex] [4] ▸ running: `/bin/zsh -lc \"cd…`\r\n40:2025-12-29 11:48:50,117 [codex] [4] ✓ ran: `/bin/zsh -lc \"cd…` (exit 0)\r\n41:2025-12-29 11:48:52,525 [codex] [5] ▸ running: `/bin/zsh -lc \"cd…`\r\n42:2025-12-29 11:48:52,623 [codex] [5] ✓ ran: `/bin/zsh -lc \"cd…` (exit 0)\r\n43:2025-12-29 11:49:03,967 [codex] [6] ▸ running: `/bin/zsh -lc 'cd…`\r\n44:2025-12-29 11:49:04,065 [codex] [6] ✓ ran: `/bin/zsh -lc 'cd…` (exit 0)\r\n45:2025-12-29 11:49:06,388 [codex] [7] ▸ running: `/bin/zsh -lc \"cd…`\r\n46:2025-12-29 11:49:06,478 [codex] [7] ✓ ran: `/bin/zsh -lc \"cd…` (exit 0)\r\n47:2025-12-29 11:49:08,998 [codex] [8] ▸ running: `/bin/zsh -lc \"cd…`\r\n48:2025-12-29 11:49:09,096 [codex] [8] ✓ ran: `/bin/zsh -lc \"cd…` (exit 0)\r\n49:2025-12-29 11:49:11,585 [codex] [9] ▸ running: `/bin/zsh -lc \"cd…`\r\n50:2025-12-29 11:49:11,691 [codex] [9] ✓ ran: `/bin/zsh -lc \"cd…` (exit 0)\r\n51:2025-12-29 11:49:16,302 [codex] [10] **Examining messaging tests**\r\n53:I’m looking into the messaging tests. It seems that we should add tests for _handle_message, especially to confirm that it uses disable_notification correctly. Since _handle_message is async and interacts with TelegramClient and runner, I'm thinking about whether we can create stub objects or if we can just use the existing ones. I’ll check out the beginning of src/takopi/exec_bridge.py to understand the types and functions involved.\r\n54:2025-12-29 11:49:16,886 [codex] [11] ▸ running: `/bin/zsh -lc \"cd…`\r\n55:2025-12-29 11:49:17,004 [codex] [11] ✓ ran: `/bin/zsh -lc \"cd…` (exit 0)\r\n56:2025-12-29 11:49:19,624 [codex] [12] ▸ running: `/bin/zsh -lc \"cd…`\r\n57:2025-12-29 11:49:19,725 [codex] [12] ✓ ran: `/bin/zsh -lc \"cd…` (exit 2)\r\n58:2025-12-29 11:49:22,286 [codex] [13] ▸ running: `/bin/zsh -lc 'cd…`\r\n59:2025-12-29 11:49:22,387 [codex] [13] ✓ ran: `/bin/zsh -lc 'cd…` (exit 0)\r\n60:2025-12-29 11:49:25,494 [codex] [14] ▸ running: `/bin/zsh -lc \"cd…`\r\n61:2025-12-29 11:49:25,598 [codex] [14] ✓ ran: `/bin/zsh -lc \"cd…` (exit 0)\r\n62:2025-12-29 11:49:39,923 [codex] [15] **Fixing notification settings**\r\n64:I’m reviewing the BridgeConfig setup, which only has progress_silent and final_notify. The fix involves changing disable_notification for the final message when sending a new message. This means wherever cfg.final_notify is applicable or can_edit_final, I'll call _send_markdown with disable_notification set to False. Currently, the final message uses _send_markdown, where the default for disable_notification is False, but passing cfg.progress_silent makes it default to True. I think it’s best to explicitly set disable_notification to False for the final message.\r\n65:2025-12-29 11:49:39,923 [codex] [16] **Considering error notifications**\r\n68:2025-12-29 11:49:39,924 [codex] [17] **Exploring notification behavior**\r\n71:2025-12-29 11:49:40,784 [codex] [18] ▸ running: `/bin/zsh -lc 'cd…`\r\n72:2025-12-29 11:49:40,881 [codex] [18] ✓ ran: `/bin/zsh -lc 'cd…` (exit 0)\r\n73:2025-12-29 11:49:42,917 [codex] [19] ▸ running: `/bin/zsh -lc \"cd…`\r\n74:2025-12-29 11:49:43,014 [codex] [19] ✓ ran: `/bin/zsh -lc \"cd…` (exit 0)\r\n75:2025-12-29 11:49:52,232 [codex] [20] ▸ running: `/bin/zsh -lc 'cd…`\r\n76:2025-12-29 11:49:52,324 [codex] [20] ✓ ran: `/bin/zsh -lc 'cd…` (exit 0)\r\n77:2025-12-29 11:50:16,927 [codex] [21] **Considering async tests**\r\n79:Currently, I'm using synchronous tests, but adding async tests might mean introducing a new dependency like pytest-asyncio, which I want to avoid. Instead,…3301 tokens truncated… tests passed after importing exec_bridge earlier, maybe there was a misunderstanding, possibly due to an outdated file. Even though Python checks timestamps and usually uses the source file, could it be sticking with a cached version?\r\n203:2025-12-29 11:56:14,108 [codex] [17] **Examining Python compiled files**\r\n205:Python uses `.pyc` files when the source file's modification time matches the stored time and size. In our repo, we have compiled files in `src/takopi/__pycache__/exec_bridge.cpython-314.pyc`. If Python opts for the `.pyc` over the source, it's possible that a previous version contained different imports or definitions. Although our tests run quickly and may be using the `.pyc`, changing exec_bridge.py should update its timestamp. But if a patch preserves that timestamp, would the new changes affect the use of the cached version?\r\n206:2025-12-29 11:56:14,108 [codex] [18] **Testing Python imports**\r\n208:The import should read the source and recompile if necessary. If it’s invalid, it should still fail, but it didn't. Maybe the functions in exec_bridge.py aren't actually from `.rendering`; instead, they might come from a different module. Our Python command imported `takopi.rendering` from a local file, which seems to be missing. So I’m going to try: `uv run python -c \"from takopi.rendering import render_to_html\"` to see what happens. Let’s test that out!\r\n209:2025-12-29 11:56:14,382 [codex] [19] ▸ running: `/bin/zsh -lc 'cd…`\r\n210:2025-12-29 11:56:14,571 [codex] [19] ✓ ran: `/bin/zsh -lc 'cd…` (exit 1)\r\n211:2025-12-29 11:56:31,318 [codex] [20] **Investigating import issues**\r\n213:It seems there's a contradiction regarding the exec_bridge module and the related tests. Although the tests earlier indicated that exec_bridge imported successfully, the test results are confusing because they passed yet seem to rely on imports that should fail. I wonder if an earlier patch might have altered an import, but I didn't change any imports. Perhaps there is an alternative rendering module earlier in the path, but it should prioritize local modules. This is quite puzzling!\r\n214:2025-12-29 11:56:31,322 [codex] [21] **Clarifying import behavior**\r\n216:I’m trying to understand why tests passed despite the discrepancies with the `exec_bridge` module. It’s possible the tests didn’t run from scratch, but every `uv run pytest` should initiate a fresh Python process. We ran it after the patch, and it passed, indicating that `takopi.rendering` had the necessary functions. It’s puzzling that our file claims otherwise. I wonder if the tests might be using a different `sys.path`. The conftest inserts the right `src` directory, so that seems correct.\r\n217:2025-12-29 11:56:31,322 [codex] [22] **Inspecting import statements**\r\n219:I’m wondering if there’s another file, like `src/takopi/rendering.py`, that we missed. It seems crucial. I might have misread the import statement in `exec_bridge.py`; maybe it imports `render_markdown` as `render_to_html` instead of the functions I expected. To clarify, I should check the import lines at the top of `exec_bridge.py`. I’ll take a closer look at lines 1-40 to get a better understanding of what's really happening there.\r\n220:2025-12-29 11:56:31,618 [codex] [23] ▸ running: `/bin/zsh -lc \"cd…`\r\n221:2025-12-29 11:56:31,717 [codex] [23] ✓ ran: `/bin/zsh -lc \"cd…` (exit 0)\r\n222:2025-12-29 11:56:41,307 [codex] [24] ▸ running: `/bin/zsh -lc 'cd…`\r\n223:2025-12-29 11:56:41,418 [codex] [24] ✓ ran: `/bin/zsh -lc 'cd…` (exit 1)\r\n224:2025-12-29 11:56:52,544 [codex] [25] **Investigating missing imports**\r\n227:2025-12-29 11:56:52,769 [codex] [26] ▸ running: `/bin/zsh -lc \"cd…`\r\n228:2025-12-29 11:56:52,870 [codex] [26] ✓ ran: `/bin/zsh -lc \"cd…` (exit 0)\r\n229:2025-12-29 11:56:58,977 [codex] [27] ▸ running: `/bin/zsh -lc \"cd…`\r\n230:2025-12-29 11:56:59,081 [codex] [27] ✓ ran: `/bin/zsh -lc \"cd…` (exit 0)\r\n231:2025-12-29 11:57:15,994 [debug] file logger initialized path='exec_bridge.log'\r\n\r\n./readme.md\r\n1:# Telegram Codex Bridge (Codex)\r\n3:Route Telegram replies back into Codex sessions using non-interactive\r\n4:`codex exec` + `codex exec resume`.\r\n6:The bridge stores a mapping from `(chat_id, bot_message_id)` to a route so\r\n13:3. Put your Telegram credentials in `~/.codex/telegram.toml`.\r\n15:Example `~/.codex/telegram.toml`:\r\n18:bot_token = \"123:abc\"\r\n22:`chat_id` is used both for allowed messages and startup notifications.\r\n26:- exec/resume: `cd`, `codex_exec_args`\r\n33:uv run takopi\r\n42:- `--cd PATH` (pass through to `codex --cd`)\r\n43:- `--model NAME` (pass through to `codex exec`)\r\n45:To resume an existing thread without a database, reply with (or include) the session id shown at the end of the bot response:\r\n50:- `src/takopi/constants.py`: limits and config path constants\r\n51:- `src/takopi/config.py`: config loading and chat-id parsing helpers\r\n52:- `src/takopi/exec_render.py`: renderers for codex exec JSONL events\r\n53:- `src/takopi/rendering.py`: markdown rendering\r\n54:- `src/takopi/telegram_client.py`: Telegram Bot API client\r\n55:- `src/takopi/exec_bridge.py`: codex exec + resume bridge\r\n\r\n./pyproject.toml\r\n2:name = \"takopi\"\r\n4:description = \"Telegram bridge tools for Codex.\"\r\n15:takopi = \"takopi.exec_bridge:main\"\r\n22:packages = [\"src/takopi\"]\r\n25:include = [\"src/takopi\", \"readme.md\"]\r\n\r\n./src/takopi/constants.py\r\n5:TELEGRAM_HARD_LIMIT = 4096\r\n6:TELEGRAM_CONFIG_PATH = Path.home() / \".codex\" / \"telegram.toml\"\r\n\r\n./tests/test_exec_render.py\r\n3:from takopi.exec_render import ExecProgressRenderer, render_event_cli\r\n15:{\"type\":\"item.completed\",\"item\":{\"id\":\"item_1\",\"type\":\"command_execution\",\"command\":\"bash -lc ls\",\"aggregated_output\":\"2025-09-11\\\\nAGENTS.md\\\\nCHANGELOG.md\\\\ncliff.toml\\\\ncodex-cli\\\\ncodex-rs\\\\ndocs\\\\nexamples\\\\nflake.lock\\\\nflake.nix\\\\nLICENSE\\\\nnode_modules\\\\nNOTICE\\\\npackage.json\\\\npnpm-lock.yaml\\\\npnpm-workspace.yaml\\\\nPNPM.md\\\\nREADME.md\\\\nscripts\\\\nsdk\\\\ntmp\\\\n\",\"exit_code\":0,\"status\":\"completed\"}}\r\n\r\n./tests/test_exec_bridge.py\r\n6:from takopi.exec_bridge import extract_session_id, truncate_for_telegram\r\n16:def test_truncate_for_telegram_preserves_resume_line() -> None:\r\n20: out = truncate_for_telegram(md, 400)\r\n27:class _FakeBot:\r\n91: from takopi.exec_bridge import BridgeConfig, _handle_message\r\n93: bot = _FakeBot()\r\n95: cfg = BridgeConfig(\r\n96: bot=bot, # type: ignore[arg-type]\r\n118: assert len(bot.send_calls) == 2\r\n119: assert bot.send_calls[0][\"disable_notification\"] is True\r\n120: assert bot.send_calls[1][\"disable_notification\"] is False\r\n124: from takopi.exec_bridge import BridgeConfig, _handle_message\r\n126: bot = _FakeBot()\r\n128: cfg = BridgeConfig(\r\n129: bot=bot, # type: ignore[arg-type]\r\n151: assert len(bot.send_calls) == 2\r\n152: assert bot.send_calls[0][\"disable_notification\"] is True\r\n153: assert bot.send_calls[1][\"disable_notification\"] is False\r\n156:def test_codex_runner_cancellation_terminates_subprocess(tmp_path, monkeypatch) -> None:\r\n157: from takopi.exec_bridge import CodexExecRunner\r\n160: codex_path = tmp_path / \"codex\"\r\n161: codex_path.write_text(\r\n166: \"pid_file = os.environ.get('CODEX_FAKE_PID_FILE')\\n\"\r\n175: codex_path.chmod(0o755)\r\n176: monkeypatch.setenv(\"CODEX_FAKE_PID_FILE\", str(pid_file))\r\n178: runner = CodexExecRunner(codex_cmd=str(codex_path), workspace=None, extra_args=[])\r\n202: raise AssertionError(\"cancelled codex subprocess is still running\")\r\n\r\n./src/takopi/exec_bridge.py\r\n21:from .config import load_telegram_config\r\n22:from .constants import TELEGRAM_HARD_LIMIT\r\n25:from .telegram_client import TelegramClient\r\n50: logger.info(\"[codex][stderr] %s\", decoded.rstrip())\r\n53: logger.debug(\"[codex][stderr] drain error: %s\", e)\r\n83:TELEGRAM_TEXT_LIMIT = TELEGRAM_HARD_LIMIT\r\n84:TELEGRAM_MARKDOWN_LIMIT = 3500\r\n87:def _clamp_tg_text(text: str, limit: int = TELEGRAM_TEXT_LIMIT) -> str:\r\n93:def truncate_for_telegram(text: str, limit: int) -> str:\r\n95: Truncate text to fit Telegram limits while preserving the trailing `resume: ...`\r\n132:def render_for_telegram(\r\n137: rendered = truncate_for_telegram(rendered, limit)\r\n143: bot: TelegramClient,\r\n150: rendered, entities = render_for_telegram(text, limit=TELEGRAM_MARKDOWN_LIMIT)\r\n152: return await bot.send_message(\r\n164:class CodexExecRunner:\r\n166: Runs Codex in non-interactive mode:\r\n167: - new: codex exec --json ... -\r\n168: - resume: codex exec --json ... resume